🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a misguided view of the European Union. The document asserts that open-border policies and what it terms "progressive" agendas pose an grave threat to the continent's identity. However, this argument is based on a fundamental misinterpretation of the reality. The true challenge facing the EU is not societal but economic and technological lag.

A Glaring Growth Gap Between the US and Europe

Statistics paint a stark picture. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by 87%, compared to a paltry thirteen and a half percent growth for the European Union. During this period, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just half of the US level. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than several leading EU nations like France and Italy.

Today, about half of the global top fifty technology firms are US-based, while only four are European.

The Innovation Deficit: A Critical Problem

The growing disparity stems from superior productivity growth in the US, fueled by breakthroughs and better use of resources. The landscape of world technology dominance is decidedly American. In the last five decades, 241 US firms have scaled into companies valued at more than $10bn, compared with only fourteen in Europe.

This gap prompts a vital question: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, where does Europe positioned? Experts widely concede it is largely a two-horse race between the United States and China, with Europe starting at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Innovation Gap

A number of major factors account for this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a much more robust and more dynamic network for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a genuine unified investment market, a factor that caps the growth potential of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided rules hamper Europe. A US startup can launch a product under one regulatory framework to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population, is divided among 27 separate regimes, creating significant internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Views on entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often considered a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has weakened its ability in pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, there are reasons for hope. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have begun to advance serious reform. Notable analyses on EU competitiveness and the single market point to the necessity of major reforms.

Given appropriate policies and rule changes, these assets could support much higher degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent retains significant strengths: high-quality workforce, excellent schools and universities, and world-class labs. Coupled with a large internal market and substantial household savings, these elements have the potential to unleash a surge of venture creation.

Crucially, even if Europe does not take the lead in creating cutting-edge technologies, it can still significantly increase economic output by adopting and adapting advancements from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

The European Union now stands at a critical crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, the continent's technological decline has been steady. But, without decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a sudden and irreversible loss of global economic relevance.